
OPERATIONAL DEFECT DATABASE
...


...

We checked the AD membership for the admin user ksxxxx, how is only member of AD 0. We logged in as default admin user with AD membership 0-255 and enabled the root user successful. After FOS upgrade, the root account was disabled. Customer tries to enable root account and got an error message: SWxxx:admin> userconfig --change root -e yes Cannot manage the target account due to conflicting AD permissions
SWxxx:admin> userconfig --show -a Account name: kstxxxx Description: Kurt Sxxxx Enabled: Yes Password Last Change Date: Fri Nov 2 2018 (UTC) Password Expiration Date: Not Applicable (UTC) Locked: No Role: admin AD membership: 0 Home AD: 0 Day Time Access: N/A To enable root account, the account must be AD Membership 0-255 witch is default for admin account that is: Account name: admin Description: Administrator Enabled: Yes Password Last Change Date: Mon Jan 28 2019 (UTC) Password Expiration Date: Not Applicable (UTC) Locked: No Role: admin AD membership: 0-255 Home AD: 0 Day Time Access: N/A
A user must have a role of admin and be a physical fabric administrator in order to change the enable the root account with "userconfig" command. A physical fabric administrator is a member of all ADs as shown below from the output of "userconfig --show":AD membership: 0-255 In this case, the user had only AD membership to AD 0: SW222:admin> userconfig --show -a Account name: kstxxxx AD membership: 0
Click on a version to see all relevant bugs
Dell Integration
Learn more about where this data comes from
Bug Scrub Advisor
Streamline upgrades with automated vendor bug scrubs
BugZero Enterprise
Wish you caught this bug sooner? Get proactive today.