...
Currently, copy RPCs do not support arbitrary file systems. The currenty RPC supports only these source/destination file systems based on the pattern: rpc copy { description "Copy from one file to another"; input { leaf source-drop-node-name { mandatory true; type string { pattern '((((bootflash:)|(harddisk:)|(flash:)|(nvram:)|(ftp:)|(http:)|(https:)|(scp:)|(tftp:)).*)|((running-config)|(startup-config)))'; } } This limits the functionality on using the copy RPC for platforms such as switch stacks whom may have multiple members with different mapping names for the mounts Switch#show file system File Systems: Size(b) Free(b) Type Flags Prefixes - - opaque rw system: - - opaque rw tmpsys: 1651314688 1363206144 disk rw crashinfo: crashinfo-1: 1651507200 1368391680 disk rw crashinfo-2: stby-crashinfo: * 11353194496 5631143936 disk rw flash: bootflash: flash-1: 11353980928 2658140160 disk rw flash-2: stby-flash: 3839950848 3725824000 disk ro webui: - - opaque rw null: A sample RPC response returned would show an invalid value: "flash-1:test" is an invalid value.source-drop-node-name
This is only applicable to copy RPCs used by restconf/netconf-yang models.
There are no known workarounds for this.
Click on a version to see all relevant bugs
Cisco Integration
Learn more about where this data comes from
Bug Scrub Advisor
Streamline upgrades with automated vendor bug scrubs
BugZero Enterprise
Wish you caught this bug sooner? Get proactive today.