
OPERATIONAL DEFECT DATABASE
...

...
$ snmpwalk -v2c -c test switch1 IF-MIB::ifIndex.1543525976 = INTEGER: 1543525976 IF-MIB::ifIndex.1509949440 = INTEGER: 1509949440 Error: OID not increasing: IF-MIB::ifIndex.1543525976 >= IF-MIB::ifIndex.1509949440 Another example when NVE interface is configured: $snmpwalk -v 2c -c test switch1 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1 IF-MIB::ifIndex.436237312 = INTEGER: 436237312 IF-MIB::ifIndex.436237824 = INTEGER: 436237824 IF-MIB::ifIndex.1543525976 = INTEGER: 1543525976 IF-MIB::ifIndex.1224736769 = INTEGER: 1224736769 Error: OID not increasing: IF-MIB::ifIndex.1543525976>= IF-MIB::ifIndex.1224736769$
+ Sub-interface configured with number higher than 511 show interface snmp-ifindex Eth1/43 436229120 (0x1a005400) Eth1/44 436229632 (0x1a005600) Eth1/44.200 436229832 (0x1a0056c8) Eth1/44.511 436230143 (0x1a0057ff) Eth1/44.512 1543525888 (0x5c005600) Eth1/44.600 1543525976 (0x5c005658) Eth1/45 436230144 (0x1a005800) Eth1/46 436230656 (0x1a005a00) Eth1/47 436231168 (0x1a005c00) Eth1/60 436237824 (0x1a007600) Vlan1 151060481 (0x9010001) nve1 1224736769 (0x49000001) Eth1/1-Ctrl 1509949440 (0x5a000000) Eth1/2-Ctrl 1509949444 (0x5a000004) Eth1/3-Ctrl 1509949448 (0x5a000008) + requesting SNMP data (eg. snmpwalk) which includes "ifindex" object (1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1) + NVE interface created. There is no need to have any config on it. + NVE interface is not needed if MACSEC is used as in that scenario we have SNMP indexes assigned to "Ethx/y-Ctrl" interfaces and those "Eth x/y-Ctrl" interfaces are having indexes lower than sub-interface index(with number higher than 511). Due to that facts request may fail because sub-interface index is requested earlier.
+ Avoid using sub-interfaces higher than 511 + Skip "ifindex" object in snmp requests
Click on a version to see all relevant bugs
Cisco Integration
Learn more about where this data comes from
Bug Scrub Advisor
Streamline upgrades with automated vendor bug scrubs
BugZero Enterprise
Wish you caught this bug sooner? Get proactive today.